![]() ![]() My notes below on evidence are incomplete and ignore a fair amount of doubt about the interpretations, but discussion of the evidence is in flux in any case. ![]() He continues to work with historians and archaeologists to improve the evidence Menzies web site contains more, and more recent, details than the bookalong with a sequel and an exploration of the Atlantis myth, which might explain why hes not taken seriously by many historians. Its efficient but unconvincing.īut the story is intriguing, and the heart of his evidence a substantial number of charts in European hands, showing detailed knowledge of areas no Europeans had yet explored seems pretty solid. This might explain his tendency to treat working hypotheses as conclusions, thereby proving much with little evidence. He is a former navy captain, and I believe he is used to committing to a decision on available evidence without waiting for absolute proof. ![]() He just does it badly, stressing his least trustworthy evidence and conclusions and giving short shrift to alternatives. There might be dispute over treating this as history historical novel is preferred by at least one hostile website (which has its own problems).Īs far as I can tell, Menzies believes hes writing history. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |